- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:04:09 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 23:04:50 UTC
/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say: | Discussing changes with me first is great, but One thing I started working on was a new option, --flatxml that outputs a non-RDF XML representation of the data. I'd be tempted, in fact, to rename the --xml option to --rdf and use --xml for the flat XML. Is that a controversial or friendly amendment? :-) Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There is no excellent beauty that hath http://nwalsh.com/ | not some strangeness in the | proportion.--Sir Francis Bacon
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 23:04:50 UTC