W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > March 2004

Re: WordNet Task Force - work outline

From: Morten Frederiksen <morten@wasab.dk>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:57:16 +0200
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: danbri@w3.org, Matt Biddulph <matt@picdiary.com>, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <04033019571601.01127@zonker.mfd-consult.dk>

Hi Jeremy,

[This is in reply to a post on swbp-wg, I'm not a member, so...]

On Tuesday 30 March 2004 17:35, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> This use of WordNet is fairly naive (in the sense that non-experts can do
> it) and does not depend on any of the relationships between words.
You are of course right, that the standalone usage that Norm is doing doesn't 
depend on any relationships, but it is quite possible to do so.

Matt Biddulph has been doing this for a while, for his picture annotations 
(unfortunately the search thingy is down atm, pending a wordnet upgrade):


This approach does use the subclass relationships of the wordnet RDF mapping 
- it may not be perfect from a linguistic or semantic standpoint, but I think 
it's a good start.

Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 13:20:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:25 UTC