- From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:54:14 +0900
- To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
- Cc: Morten Frederiksen <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>
Hi Mortern, all At 11:04 PM +0100 04.1.21, Morten Frederiksen wrote: >Heh, I don't know if that was a typo - namespage - but that's a very nice >word, completely closes the isue with what's supposed to be at the end of a >namespace. ;) Ouch, it was a typo ;-) I agree with you for the need of a 'page' though. >Great, I think perhaps we could develop a set of standard functions in >various languages that did the bounding box computations, to make sure nobody >is left out of the loop because of lack of tool support. Yes, good idea. >Also, I see in the logs that it is being suggested that regions should be >identified by URI. I'm not sure I agree on that, since as Libby pointed out, >regions are not directly displayable, and it paves the way for somewhat >easier "desctruction" of regions by mistake. Fragment id's for region seems tricky, because there are almost infinite combinations of coordinates in an image. I think it's reasonable to have rdf:ID's in annotation's region constructs. I mean, not: <Region rdf:about="image-uri#fragID"> but: <Region rdf:ID="idInAnnotation"> is much more manageable. People can mention to the region via this annotation like: <rdf:Description rdf:about="annotationUri#idInAnnotation> <dc:description>more comments ...</dc:comments> ... This will ensure people talking about the same topic (annotation). >However, that would make it possible for a friendly service to add >boundingBox properties to regions that didn't have them already... You mean a third party can add boudingBox to the annotation without it ? Maybe that's an idea. And I think idInAnnotation can help this. Make sense ? cheers, (I think I got around mail address, and hope this message will be archived) -- KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com #Please use above address for a personal mail #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2004 20:55:20 UTC