- From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:45:32 +0900
- To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
At 1:07 PM +0000 04.2.27, Libby Miller wrote: >> But there is probably no need for option 1 in the imreg vocabulary. and >> Libby said there will be an "official" image+EXIF schema at w3.org soon, > >actually there's something up there already:: > >http://www.w3.org/2003/12/exif/ > >which does include image height and width. It's not complete yet but it >would probably make sense to use the image height and width properties >from the exif namespace. I included width/height in Exif vocabulary as convenient terms to describe those values from JPEG information, not Exif tags. But now I'm afraid 'exif:width' may imply this value is contained in the Exif data in a image, which could be misleading. I've been thinking to deprecate these properties (actually, my exif2rdf uses Jim's width/height instead), but the vocabulary went public ... I'm not sure whether this is a problem or not. If not, fine to keep these terms in Exif vocab, and use them in image descriptions. cheers, -- KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com #Please use above address for a personal mail #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Sunday, 29 February 2004 02:45:56 UTC