W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [w3photo] image regions vocab update

From: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:45:32 +0900
Message-Id: <p04320403bc67490eb6d4@[[]]>
To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com

At 1:07 PM +0000 04.2.27, Libby Miller wrote:
>> But there is probably no need for option 1 in the imreg vocabulary. and
>> Libby said there will be an "official" image+EXIF schema at w3.org soon,
>actually there's something up there already::
>which does include image height and width. It's not complete yet but it
>would probably make sense to use the image height and width properties
>from the exif namespace.

I included width/height in Exif vocabulary as convenient terms to describe
those values from JPEG information, not Exif tags. But now I'm afraid
'exif:width' may imply this value is contained in the Exif data in a image,
which could be misleading.

I've been thinking to deprecate these properties (actually, my exif2rdf
uses Jim's width/height instead), but the vocabulary went public ...

I'm not sure whether this is a problem or not. If not, fine to keep these
terms in Exif vocab, and use them in image descriptions.


KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka
#Please use above address for a personal mail
#instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only.
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Sunday, 29 February 2004 02:45:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:22 UTC