Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >> I noticed, by looking at Libby's example, that 'width' and 'height' are not >> part of the proposed vocabulary. Why not adding them to the vocab ? I think >> we have a lot of use cases for these properties, and find no reason to >> leave them alone in Jim's namespace. >Makes sense to me but I was unclear whether we needed them for >transformation to SVG still - perhaps Jim or Morten could clarify? I'm not exactly sure, but I guess we figured that there were enough width/height properties out there. Of course, no consideration to domain/range issues has been involved, as there might be some properties that have a domain of e.g. Image, which is not desirable for regions. Regards, Morten Frederiksen --- 30 minutes of begging is not considered foreplay. -- <URL: http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/explorer/?foaf=morten.rdf > ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: helpReceived on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:51:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:22 UTC