W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > February 2004

Re: [w3photo] Re: w3photo vocabulary

From: Morten Frederiksen <mof-rdf@mfd-consult.dk>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:50:40 +0100
To: semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
Message-ID: <QeoKAtq3IzdS092yn@mfd-consult.dk>

Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>> I noticed, by looking at Libby's example, that 'width' and 'height' are not
>> part of the proposed vocabulary. Why not adding them to the vocab ? I think
>> we have a lot of use cases for these properties, and find no reason to
>> leave them alone in Jim's namespace.
>Makes sense to me but I was unclear whether we needed them for
>transformation to SVG still - perhaps Jim or Morten could clarify?
I'm not exactly sure, but I guess we figured that there were enough
width/height properties out there. Of course, no consideration to
domain/range issues has been involved, as there might be some
properties that have a domain of e.g. Image, which is not desirable for

Morten Frederiksen
30 minutes of begging is not considered foreplay.
<URL: http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/explorer/?foaf=morten.rdf >
This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History
Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net.

Subscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: subscribe

Unsubscribe Instructions
To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: unsubscribe

To:   semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com
Body: help
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2004 14:51:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:22 UTC