- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:25:51 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Masahide Kanzaki <post@kanzaki.com>
- Cc: Greg Elin <elin@unitboy.com>, Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>, semantic-photolist@unitboy.com
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Masahide Kanzaki wrote: > Hi, > > Now a few weeks passed after the discussion of the w3photo vocabulary, I > want to make the current situation of proposed terms a bit clearer. > > As per discussion by Morten and Jim, following classes and properties were > proposed [1]: > > At 1:00 AM +0100 04.1.21, Morten Frederiksen wrote: > >Classes: > >- Image > >- Region (subclassed into Polygon, Circle etc.) > > > >Properties: > >- hasRegion (with inverse regionOf) > > * domain: Image > > * range: Region > >- regionDepicts (with inverse regionDepiction) > > * domain: Region > > * range: Resource (Person, perhaps a wordnet concept, anything etc.) > > In addition, property 'coords' was discussed in the same massage: > > >After the meeting, Jim and I discussed the issue again [8], reaching > >a compromise for a solution proposal: > >- One property, coords, for circle, polygon and rectangle, with a domain of > > Region and a range of Literal. To keep compatibility with HTML image > > > I find two resources that explain the vocabularies of w3photo: Libby's > W3PhotoVocab Wiki page [2] and Benjamin's OWL pages [3]. > > Libby's wiki seems to show examples with existing vocabularies rather than > proposed one, but includes 'image:regionDepicts', which is not a part of > Jim's vocab. Benjamin's page has both existing and proposed terms, but not > contain 'coords' and 'regionDepicts' properties. ok, I hope I haven't confused things too much. I will change [2] to reflect these changes today. > > All those combined, the current situation of the vocab is a bit confusing > for me. Shall we just wait for the new namespace (who will define ?), or is > there still any argument ? I agree that we need a namespace for this vocabulary. Perhaps a temporary place for it might do. Libby > > Sorry if I miss some important notes, but I think it'd be happier to have > clearer information on this. > > cheers, > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0096.html > [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/W3PhotoVocabs > [3] http://www.bnowack.de/w3photo/pages/vocabs > > -- > KANZAKI, Masahide a.k.a. masaka > http://kanzaki.com/info/webwho.rdf > mailto:webmaster(at)kanzaki.com > #Please use above address for a personal mail > #instead of post@kanzaki.com, which is for list only. > > ================================== This is the TEMPORARY discussion list for the W3 Semantic-Photo History Project. For questions, contact greg@fotonotes.net. Subscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: subscribe Unsubscribe Instructions To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: unsubscribe Help To: semantic-photolist-request@unitboy.com Body: help
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 07:43:05 UTC