- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:19:51 +0300
- To: "ext Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>
- Cc: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
Sorry for disappearing over the long weekend (holidays, family, travel, and all those sorts of distractions... ;-) On Apr 08, 2004, at 16:38, ext Chris Bizer wrote: > > Hi, > > > The Semantic Web consists of many RDF graphs named by URIs. "named by" -> "nameable by" I.e. the SW also includes alot of unnamed graphs... > This > paper extends the syntax and semantics of RDF to cover such > collections of Named Graphs. "to cover such collections of Named Graphs" -> "to cover such Named Graphs" I think the term 'collections' may be too loaded. Better to state it more generally. > This enables RDF statements that > describe graphs, which is beneficial in many Semantic Web > application areas. As a case study, we explore the application > area of Semantic Web publishing: Named Graphs allow publishers to > communicate assertional intent, and to sign their graphs; > information consumers can evaluate specific graphs using > task-specific trust policies, and act on information from those > named graphs that they accept. Graphs are trusted depending on: > their content; information about the graph; and the task the user > is performing. The extension of RDF to Named Graphs provides a > formally defined framework which could be used as a foundation for > the Semantic Web trust layer. I like the rest. > > Is the last sentence to ambitious? It doesn't seem so to me. > We could also write: > > This provides a foundation for information consumers to subjectively > evaluate the trustworthiness of information found on the Semantic Web > using > a formally defined framework. I like the first version above better. Patrick > > I will include some other changes, that I have discussed with Jeremy, > and > send an updated version of the paper tonight. > > Chris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> > Cc: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>; "Patrick Stickler" > <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>; <www-archive@w3.org>; "ext Chris Bizer" > <chris@bizer.de> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:35 PM > Subject: Re: Named graphs next draft > > >> >> Locks etc. >> >> Chris currently has the latex sources with lock. >> Later today, he should send these sources to Pat and the archive and >> Pat >> can either change the latex sources or write plain text (like last >> time). >> >> Chris would like the lock on Tuesday UK time, I would like the lock on >> Wednesday. >> >> Pat could have the lock from this evening through to Monday night. >> >> Hope this works, >> >> Chris and Pat can probably sort things. >> >> Please make sure there is an agreed abstract on the archive soon, >> since I >> will submit it Monday. >> >> Jeremy >> >> > > > -- Patrick Stickler Nokia, Finland patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 02:28:12 UTC