- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 18:42:46 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, massimo@w3.org
- Message-Id: <200404071842.52057.rigo@w3.org>
Dan, having not enough knowledge about XQuery, I'm reluctant to add a note. Especially as one can express more or less everything that P3P or APPEL do in XQuery as XQuery is a very generic specification. As P3P, EPAL and APPEL are designed for a specific area (privacy), they tend to try to limit overhead by making very lean specifications. This means that they only implement the functions they need. Now if you know xpath-functions well and can point to the right functions and how they mismatch with the functions specified by EPAL, this could be beneficial. But if it is saying: "you should require xpath-functions" I would say that this is not what they mean and surely not what I expect from EPAL. It would be good if you could add a word to remind the group if it is chartered.. Best, Rigo Am Tuesday 06 April 2004 22:59 verlautbarte Dan Connolly : > Rigo, > > I happened to skim the EPAL note and saw > > "Appendix 5.1 EPAL Functions" > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2003/SUBM-EPAL-20031110/#Functions > > That seems to overlap substantially with the XQuery > functions and operators > http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions > > That's the sort of overlap I think we're supposed to note > in the team comments. I looked at the team comment > http://www.w3.org/Submission/2003/07/Comment > of $Date: 2003/12/01 14:14:05 $ and I don't see anything > about XQuery overlap. > > Would you please add something? Would you mind if I added > something? > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 12:43:28 UTC