- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:26:48 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>, www-archive@w3.org
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:29:49PM -0500, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > No. They were created on different dates - for example. Granted. But while that's some interesting meta data about the resource, it's not the kind of information that a client would use to determine what it was dealing with; it's purely ancillary. I expect that any other information you could identify that differed between a car and a conceptual work about a car, was the same. In other words, if we had a set of representations of a car without this metadata, and a set with it, a client should still be able to expect that the resource is a car. They'd just be confused to learn that the creator of the car was "Fred" rather than "Ford". Actually, I just thought of another problem with your model, as I understand it. How do you ever effect a state change in the real world? If URIs (with no fragids) only identify non-real things, how do I use the Web to turn a lightbulb off? If a lightbulb were identified by the URI; http://example.org/lightbulb-web-page#bulb Would a PUT to http://example.org/lightbulb-web-page of a document with the "bulb" fragment set to "off" do this? If not, how would you do it? If so, how does that differ from saving a Web page about the lightbulb without the expectation that the save action changes the state of a real bulb? MB -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 23:25:10 UTC