- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:22:19 -0500
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>
At 17:15 -0600 2003-02-04, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>>the thing I do not see, is that what you propose is a kind of "text
>>to html2" language. And there's a lot of that already.
>>
>>What's new?
>
>None of them are very good. I want something good enough to replace
>HTML and XML for writers.
http://www.triptico.com/software/grutatxt.html
README in txt
http://www.triptico.org/download/README_grutatxt
README in HTML after conversion by his program
http://www.triptico.org/download/README_grutatxt.html
And guess what it's even producing valid code
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.triptico.org/download/README_grutatxt.html
--
Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager
http://www.w3.org/QA/
--- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 22:22:24 UTC