- From: B. Johannessen <bob@db.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:50:18 -0500
- To: htmlforms@damowmow.com
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, ian@hixie.ch
I just skimmed through the XForms Basic Working Draft 4 December 2003: http://www.hixie.ch/specs/html/forms/xforms-basic and have a few comments. The draft directs comments to htmlforms@damowmow.com and www-archive@w3.org which i guess are mailing lists. I'm not subscribed to any of these, so please cc replies to bob@db.org. > email: > "An e-mail address, as defined by [RFC822] (the mailbox token, > defined in RFC822 section 6.1)." First of all, if you're going to refer to an RFC it should probably be RFC 2822 which obsoletes RFC 822. Second; please don't force client and server programmers to parse the horrible syntax of an RFC 2822 "mailbox". If it's unclear why this is a bad idea, I can come up with a few examples of valid RFC 2822 "mailbox"-es to show how bad it can get. Or you can just believe me when i say it's a disaster :-) > maxlength: > "...When this attribute is specified on text or password > controls, the server must not submit a form with the control > having more..." You probably meant to say "..the client must not..." Other then that, nice initiative! Bob -- --=[ B. Johannessen | bob@db.org | http://db.org/ | +4797152009 ]=-- ---=[ uptime: 24 days, 22:10 | load: 0.26 | inbox: 21 messages ]=--- --------------------=[xmms: Aerosmith - Crying]=--------------------
Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 16:15:19 UTC