W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:39:12 -0400
Message-Id: <200308181639.h7IGdCYu015373@roke.hawke.org>
To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: www-archive@w3.org

> Namespaces are not about disambiguating the semantics of names, just
> names as such and their ownership.

What does it mean to "own" a name?   How can you tell who or what "owns"
a name?   In what scenarios does ownership matter or appear?

I have some drafty answers to these, near to:

Lately I've been reading Kripke and getting a better handle on this,
but I haven't expressed my thoughts on it yet.

> This is not a bug, it's a feature -- as Michael Kay says,
> interpretation is always context-bound, that's in the nature of names.

And yet human and machine networks only scale when you have a global
context, like URIs and the web.   That's why we treat URIs as having
(mostly) a single meaning, right?

   -- sandro
Received on Monday, 18 August 2003 12:39:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:09 UTC