Re: Tutorial for Budapest

At 9:28 -0500 2003-04-24, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 18:08, Karl Dubost wrote:
>  > Comments about
>Thanks for the careful review.

You're welcome. But I had pleasure reading it. I wish we have more 
materials like that for all technologies.

>The tutorial materials already went to print, so
>there's a cost to making the online materials different
>from the printed stuff. We'll have to evaluate that
>cost vs. the benefit of additional clarity in the
>online materials.

so maybe, update the relevant things after Budapest
or a dated version of the document?

>I intend to reply in more detail eventually (and/or
>get TimBL and Sandro to). If I haven't
>done so in two weeks, I'd appreciate a reminder.

Thank you very much.

>Sandro, Karl sent an extensive review. It's in www-archive.
>Please take a look.
>Dan Connolly, W3C

Karl Dubost / W3C - Conformance Manager

      --- Be Strict To Be Cool! ---

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 10:40:53 UTC