- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:03:03 -0700
- To: "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>
I fixed the typo. Gudge > > -----Original Message----- > From: Noah Mendelsohn [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > Sent: 11 April 2003 20:51 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: Carine Bournez (E-mail); David Fallside; Nilo Mitra; > Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc Hadley; W3C > Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org > > I took a look at the comments changes. Basically OK, but > there is at least one spelling error: > > <current> > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or > descendants of the [document element] element information > item but not before or after that element informaton item . > There are some restrictions in the processing model with > respect to when comment information items can be added and/or > removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). > </current> > <minimalChangetoFixSpelling> > Comment information items MAY appear as children and/or > descendants of the [document element] element information > item but not before or after that element >information< item > . There are some restrictions in the processing model with > respect to when comment information items can be added and/or > removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). > </minimalChangetoFixSpelling> > > <possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?> > >Although not explicitly called out in the sections below,< comment > information items MAY appear >in the Envelope infoset< as > children and/or descendants of the [document element] element > information item, but not before or after that element > >information< item. There are some restrictions in the > processing model with respect to when comment information > items can be added and/or removed (see 2.7.2.1 Relayed Infoset). > </possibleAdditionalChangetoMakeClearer?> > > Reasons for proposed additional changes: (1) makes clear > that lack of discussion below is intentional (2) make clear > that we do consider these > part of the Envelope infoset and thus subject to > transmission. I think > that's the only coherent interpretation anyway, but someone > might be tempted to look at the sort of oblique introduction > of comments at the top of the chapter and say: "well, if > they really mattered, they would have been called out > properly." My proposal to make it an explicit note failed, > so I'm wondering if this helps a bit. > > Honestly, I'm not pushing either of these changes hard. If > all we want to do is fix the spelling, or to adopt just the > first of the additional changes, I'm fine with that. Thanks. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com> > 04/11/2003 09:35 AM > > > To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" > <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> > cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" > <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Marc Hadley" > <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" > <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Noah > Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM@Lotus, "W3C Public Archive" > <www-archive@w3.org>, <ylafon@w3.org>, David Fallside/Santa > Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "Carine Bournez \(E-mail\)" <carine@w3.org> > Subject: RE: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents > > > Yes, I added a paragraph to the start of Section 5[1] and > removed the entry from Section 1[2] > > Gudge > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#soapenv > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/04/11/soap12-part1.html#notation > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] > > Sent: 11 April 2003 14:26 > > To: Martin Gudgin > > Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo > > Mitra; Noah Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David > > Fallside; Carine Bournez (E-mail) > > > > The AI list also mentions issue 355: > > > 2003/04/09: Editors > > > Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented > > > previously) > > > > So did you do both of 421 and 422? > > > > JJ. > > > > Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > > > I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( > > Comments and the > > > redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ). > > > > > > I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday > > > > > > Gudge > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau > [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] > > >>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22 > > >>To: Martin Gudgin > > >>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah > > Mendelson; > > >>W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; Carine Bournez > > >>(E-mail) > > >> > > >>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon > > incoporating > > >>issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that? > > >> > > >>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good > > at doing > > >>this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing. > > >> > > >>Thanks for creating the snapshots, > > >> > > >>JJ. > > >> > > >>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication. > > >> > > >>Martin Gudgin wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec > > >>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed > changes, > > >>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated > > >> > > >>snap shots > > >> > > >>>at each stage of the process. > > >>> > > >>>I think all that needs doing now is the following: > > >>> > > >>>1. Update namespace URIs > > >>>2. Update status/boilerplate for PR > > >>> > > >>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? > > >>> > > >>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I > > >> > > >>just need to > > >> > > >>>know what URIs we're going to use. > > >>> > > >>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2 > > >>> > > >>>Regards > > >>> > > >>>Gudge > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2003 16:03:16 UTC