Re: SOAP 1.2 PR Documents

The AI list also mentions issue 355:
> 2003/04/09: Editors
>     Incorporate 'proper' of Issue 355 (not fully implemented previously)

So did you do both of 421 and 422?

JJ.

Martin Gudgin wrote:

> I think the only issue resolutions were 421 and 422 ( Comments and the
> redundant namespace entry in the table in Part 1 ).
> 
> I'm sorting out the TOC now, Yves is on holiday
> 
> Gudge
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
>>Sent: 11 April 2003 14:22
>>To: Martin Gudgin
>>Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah 
>>Mendelson; W3C Public Archive; ylafon@w3.org; David Fallside; 
>>Carine Bournez (E-mail)
>>
>>Ah... I was planning on spending some time this afternoon 
>>incoporating issue resolutions. Did you also do any of that?
>>
>>Apart from this (and cleaning up the TOC! -but Yves is good 
>>at doing this!-), I don't see anything else that needs doing.
>>
>>Thanks for creating the snapshots,
>>
>>JJ.
>>
>>PS. I'll on IRC shortly to speed up communication.
>>
>>Martin Gudgin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>As you may have seen from mail from me on the WG list, the spec 
>>>documents have been updated for PR. I've made the agreed changes, 
>>>removed diff markup and removed change logs. I've generated 
>>
>>snap shots 
>>
>>>at each stage of the process.
>>>
>>>I think all that needs doing now is the following:
>>>
>>>1.	Update namespace URIs
>>>2.	Update status/boilerplate for PR
>>>
>>>Does anyone know of anything else that needs doing? 
>>>
>>>I'm happy to do #1 for all three parts + schemas docs, I 
>>
>>just need to 
>>
>>>know what URIs we're going to use.
>>>
>>>I'm hoping Yves/Carine can do #2
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>Gudge
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 11 April 2003 09:26:36 UTC