- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 11:31:55 +0100
- To: www-archive <www-archive@w3.org>
[Forwarded to www-archive with permission] >Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:12:16 -0600 >To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> >From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> >Subject: Re: [URI vs. URIViews] draft-frags-borden-00.txt > >>I've this nagging feeling I'm missing something. I'm not sure how to >>reconcile: >> >> "it uses them to identify *syntactic parts of RDF documents*" >> >>with >> >> "but rather to refer to what that part refers to, ie the concept >> rdfs:Class" >> >>(both can be found in context below) There may have been a use/mention >>confusion in my example, but I was trying to present a use of a fragment >>identifier in which the corresponding URI did not refer to an RDF document. > >OK, sure. My read on the implicit assumptions we operate under is as follows. > >1. If we use a uriref of the form UURRII#ffragid as an RDF uriref, and if >UURRII is in fact the URL of a document containing some RDF, and that RDF >uses the name ffragid as an identifier, then the uriref in our document >and the id in that document are the same RDF name. > >2. Any other use of a fragId in a uriref has no special meaning for RDF, >and in particular, there is no relationship assumed by RDF between the >meaning of a uriref and the meaning of the URI that it contains; they are >just two different urirefs, is all. As Jonathan B says, urirefs are opaque. > >So: > >> >>An example from the DAML documents might be: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema#decimal >> >>which I think clearly does not identify a syntactic part of an RDF document. > >Right, so case 1 does not apply. > >[snip] > >>>>Example: >>>> >>>> urn:isbn:0-520-02356-0#page10 ex:contains "metatheory" . >>>> >>>>is, I think, perfectly legal RDF. >>> >>>OK, butI don't think it says what you want it to say. > >because case 2 applies. In other words, that uriref in the subject is not >guaranteed to denote a document. RDF has no semantic constraint to respect >the meanings of URN, only their syntax. > >Pat > > > >-- >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >IHMC (850)434 8903 home >40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >Pensacola, FL 32501 (850)202 4440 fax >phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2002 06:22:19 UTC