Re: actions now on f2f page

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 06:40, Brian McBride wrote:
> At 14:12 07/03/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >I consider these done;
> >
> >2002-02-25#12  DanC
> >Contact RFC 2396 editors to confirm that RDF will use a different 
> >algorithm for xml:base
> >2002-02-25#15  DanC
> >Confirm with RDF 2396 that xml:base="http://example.org">  decision is
> >correct
> 
> Thanks Dan.  Could you refer me to a description of the response please.

The discussion is recorded in

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/irclog-2002-02-26.html

starting with
[08:35:00] DanC
LMM: yes, re / question, the text of 6.H isn't quite clear...

thru

[09:19:14] DanC
this would require enhancing our test infrastructure to take another
input.

I think I presented it to the WG as a whole; I think
Jeremy grokked... I think the result was some actions
to change test cases and stuff in the syntax spec...

yeah:

[10:03:50] mdean_
ACTION: jeremy review error2 and error3 test cases

In short, #15 was easy; yes, we're correct.
#12 is more subtle, but I think we're agreed
what to do and Jeremy is doing it.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/