- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:20:50 +0100
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>
> *Rough* ideas for how EARL might look w/out reification. This is clever stuff, DanBri. I think that you've basically changed the model from:- [ :subject :x; :predicate :y; :object :z ] to:- [ :subject :x; :rest [ predicate :y; :object :z ] ] which is neat because when you have multiple reified statements with the same subject, you get less serialization sugar on the output. Also, since you've changed the name of the properties so that they're not "rdf:subject" etc. any more, it looks like no reification is going on at all, which can only be a good thing :-) In summary, I like it. Perhaps you'd like to send a pointer to the rest of the group? -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 10:20:57 UTC