- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-archive@w3.org>
*Rough* ideas for how EARL might look w/out reification.
I've taken very little care to be faithful to exact earl spec, just wanted
to try out some ideas...
dan
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/danbri-hatchetjob#"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" >
<ClaimPackage>
<name>Bob Bobbington</name>
<email rdf:resource="mailto:bob@example.org"/>
<regarding>
<Content>
<doclang rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11"/>
<date>2002-06-15</date>
<normalisationalAlgorithm rdf:resource="http://example.com/mynormhomepage"/>
<normalisationID>234234236235</normalisationID>
</Content>
</regarding>
<claim>
<TestResult>
<!-- Validity property, Test case ID -->
<testProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/0.95#fails"/>
<fails rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_3"/>
<note>It was an architectural decision</note>
</TestResult>
</claim>
<claim>
<TestResult>
<testProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/0.95#xyz"/>
<fails rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_abc"/>
<note>Some other comment relating to this particular result</note>
</TestResult>
</claim>
</ClaimPackage>
<TestItem rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_3">
<blurb>2.3 Use XLink and XPointer</blurb>
</TestItem>
<TestItem rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_abc">
<blurb>2.abc Using A Fictional Example Here</blurb>
</TestItem>
</rdf:RDF>
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 10:12:50 UTC