- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-archive@w3.org>
*Rough* ideas for how EARL might look w/out reification. I've taken very little care to be faithful to exact earl spec, just wanted to try out some ideas... dan <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/danbri-hatchetjob#" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" > <ClaimPackage> <name>Bob Bobbington</name> <email rdf:resource="mailto:bob@example.org"/> <regarding> <Content> <doclang rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11"/> <date>2002-06-15</date> <normalisationalAlgorithm rdf:resource="http://example.com/mynormhomepage"/> <normalisationID>234234236235</normalisationID> </Content> </regarding> <claim> <TestResult> <!-- Validity property, Test case ID --> <testProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/0.95#fails"/> <fails rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_3"/> <note>It was an architectural decision</note> </TestResult> </claim> <claim> <TestResult> <testProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/0.95#xyz"/> <fails rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_abc"/> <note>Some other comment relating to this particular result</note> </TestResult> </claim> </ClaimPackage> <TestItem rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_3"> <blurb>2.3 Use XLink and XPointer</blurb> </TestItem> <TestItem rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/xag#cp2_abc"> <blurb>2.abc Using A Fictional Example Here</blurb> </TestItem> </rdf:RDF>
Received on Monday, 24 June 2002 10:12:50 UTC