W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > July 2002

Re: next chat - 31 July 2002

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:08:36 +0100
Message-ID: <01e901c2381e$0b1b2d60$40540150@localhost>
To: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>

> I've been playing with an "annotated EARL example" [...]

Couple of comments apparently addressed to me in:-

Annotated EARL examples
Last-Modified: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:26:05 GMT

   "rdfs - is not actually used in this example. (@@SBP do we
   need to include it if it is not used?) "

Nope: you can take the xmlns:rdfs attribute out from the example. I must
have copied and pasted that bit of the file myself.

   "@@SBP how come we don't use foaf:name in this example?"

Because the domain of foaf:name is foaf:Person, according to the FOAF
schema [1]. I'd like to have a common property that we can use for both the
name of a person, and the name of a machine or service like the W3C

Hmm... actually, now that I review the FOAF page, there doesn't appear to
be any restriction on the domain of foaf:name. I am almost certain that
there used to be such a restriction, since I had to check it out for the
EARL schema a couple of months ago. Ah, here we go:-

 <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name"
 rdfs:comment="the full name of a person">

 <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person" />
 <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal" />

]]] - http://web.archive.org/web/20010605211618/http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/

Then again, no one ever said that FOAF was stable :-)

BTW, don't forgot to put your name on it if you're editing it! A CVS $Id$
or $Date$ would be cool too.

[1] http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/index.rdf

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> .
:Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 19:08:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:44 UTC