Re: ToRDF always puts Description around anon nodes; never typednodes

On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 08:31, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> Presumably this is a choice -- the output makes sense and
> correctly encodes the data


> but just isn't
> rdf as she is spoken normally.

Right; more to the point: not now cwm speaks RDF
in other cases; i.e. it's surprisingly inconsistent.

> The output scares me too, because I have not been able
> to find an intellectually satisfying API for the generator.
> I had a look at it yesterday and decided it should be low
> priority but if it used to work,

I haven't done the experiment of rolling back to see
if it works in older versions.

> or is actually incorrect, I'll fix it
> before other things.
> Tim

Dan Connolly, W3C

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 09:35:19 UTC