- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:31:46 -0500
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-archive+n3bugs@w3.org>, <connolly@w3.org>
Presumably this is a choice -- the output makes sense and correctly encodes the data but just isn't rdf as she is spoken normally. The output scares me too, because I have not been able to find an intellectually satisfying API for the generator. I had a look at it yesterday and decided it should be low priority but if it used to work, or is actually incorrect, I'll fix it before other things. Tim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> Cc: <www-archive+n3bugs@w3.org>; <connolly@w3.org> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 6:03 PM Subject: ToRDF always puts Description around anon nodes; never typednodes > I here's the testcase in full: > > --8<-- > @prefix ex: <http://example/vocab#>. > [ a ex:Foo]. > > > # test with: python ../cwm.py typednode.n3 --rdf > # you should get a typednode in the RDF output, > # i.e. not a Description element. > # as of 21Jan2002, you get Description. bug. > --8<-- > > checked in as swap/test/typednode.n3 > > The problem seems to come from recent > changes to notation3.ToRDF.startAnonymous, but the code > around there scares me... I couldn't find > a fix. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2002 09:31:48 UTC