- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:55:11 -0500 (EST)
- To: <www-archive@w3.org>
todo... query this in cwm as dc subproperties? <OnlineCourse> <author>Dan</author> <authorEmail>danbri@w3.org</authorEmail> <topic>XML</topic> <doi>30,231231</doi> <title>Dan's XML course</title> <abstract>blah blah</abstract> </OnlineCourse> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:09:09 -0500 From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> Reply-To: "This list, which supersedes dc-datamodel, dc-schema, and dc-implementors, i" <DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK> To: DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: Guidelines for implementing Dublin Core in XML On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Wagner,Harry wrote: > > From: Andy Powell > > ... DCMI needs to provide help and guidance to those > > people who are choosing not to use RDF. > > Absolutely. We should provide guidance on encoding DC in all practical > encoding methods, including XML, RDF and HTML. Personally, I don't care how > people choose to encode DC, so long as it is DC they are encoding! How would you know it was DC? Or more pedantically, what would it take to make it true that the markup was an encoding of DC? authorial intent? Could it be DC without the author knowing it was DC? Is this chunk of markup DC? <OnlineCourse> <author>Dan</author> <authorEmail>danbri@w3.org</authorEmail> <topic>XML</topic> <doi>30,231231</doi> <title>Dan's XML course</title> <abstract>blah blah</abstract> </OnlineCourse> What about this? <html> <head> <title>Dan's XML course</title> <meta name="abstract" content="blah blah blah" /> <link rel="made" href="mailto:danbri@w3.org" /> </head> <body> ... </body> </html> Dan -- mailto:danbri@w3.org http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 09:55:11 UTC