- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:00:17 -0800
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Having thought a bit more about this, I don't think we need adding the bullet in question. The reason is that forwarding is defined as a feature and hence it is up to the feature to define what the constructed message looks like. This is, in fact, already covered by the last paragraph in [1] >Should that be "0) Retain >in order< all header blocks not >targeted at the forwarding node? > >I think that might be clearer. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/12/CR/soap12-part1.html#forwardinter
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 13:01:38 UTC