- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:28:57 +0100
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, www-archive@w3.org
If we go that route, then we should also update: 3) Retain all relayable SOAP header blocks that were targeted at the forwarding node but ignored during processing. On a related note, I see you've (Henrik) not yet switched section 2.7.1 and 2.7.2? Jean-Jacques. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > HFN writes: >>>0) Retain all header blocks not targeted at the forwarding node > > Should that be "0) Retain >in order< all header blocks not targeted at the > forwarding node? > > I think that might be clearer.
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 04:29:49 UTC