- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Aug 2002 16:03:22 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 15:13, Chris Lilley wrote: [...] > I agree that there is a need to show other examples of fragment > identifiers on other media types, to convey some of the richer > possibilities, before ending that paragraph with the description of > what RDF does with fragment identifiers. > > Paul Prescod has correctly pointed out that fragment identifiers, in > XML-based formats, point to elements. I disagree. RDF is an XML-based format, but fragment identifiers in RDF don't (necessarily) refer to elements. It seems to me that both in both HTML and RDF, a URI reference foo#bar refers to 'whatever bar means in the document foo'. I still haven't researched the details of how linking works in SVG, so I'm not replying to www-tag just yet. I just wanted to note that no, this isn't the issue I was going to raise. Or maybe it is the same issue, but it's an entirely different disposition. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 30 August 2002 17:03:12 UTC