- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:01:24 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
+1 to both changes, this sounds better. Jean-Jacques. noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Part 1 section 4.2: > > <original> > In cases where multiple features are supported by a binding specification > the specifications for those features MUST provide any information > necessary for their successful use in combination. Similarly if a certain > feature cannot be used if another feature is present this MUST be > specified. > > ; this binding framework does not provide any explicit mechanism for > ensuring such compatibility of multiple features. > </original> > > note ";" following the period. I also felt the wording to be a bit lumpy. > > <revised> > In cases where multiple features are supported by a binding specification, > the specifications for those features MUST provide any information > necessary for their successful use in combination. Similarly, any > dependencies of one feature on another (I.e. if successful use of one > feature depends on use or non-use of another) MUST be specified. This > binding framework does not provide any explicit mechanism for controlling > the use of such interdependent features. > </revised> > > Part 2 > > In 5.1.1 Properties, added comma after "Where appropriate". Without the > comma the sentence parses ambiguously. > > As I say, both of these are checked into the xml versions. Any problem, > let me know and we can discuss. Thanks. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 > IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 04:01:32 UTC