Re: CWM Bug: Strings Returned from Builtins Incompatible with log:semantics

> ??? strings don't have semantics. Only formulas do.
>
> I think there's a parseN3 built-in somewhere.

Argh, you're right: log:n3ExprFor. It's a silly error that I shouldn't have
made, but it does make me wonder whether semantics and n3ExprFor couldn't
be unified. The domain would be a union of Document and Literal, and AFAIK
it would be consistent, even if it does confuse people as to the difference
between a document and its log:content.

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> .
:Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 10:44:31 UTC