- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 12 Aug 2002 23:07:36 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
reviewing recent changes, I see in the log:uri built-in: + Note that relative URIs can be OK as the whole process + has a base, which may be irrelevant. That's taken care of elsewhere in the code, no? i.e. a base URI is constructed on input, and then subtracted out on output. If I just write this log:forAll :X, :Y, :TXT. :something rdfs:label "../foo". { :X rdfs:label :TXT. :Y log:uri :TXT } log:implies { ... } in an N3 document, that shouldn't bind :Y, should it? the ../foo label for something could come from a different file. strings don't carry their base URI around with them. I guess I should write a test. But this seems plain to me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 00:06:52 UTC