- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 12 Aug 2002 23:07:36 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org
reviewing recent changes, I see in
the log:uri built-in:
+ Note that relative URIs can be OK as the whole process
+ has a base, which may be irrelevant.
That's taken care of elsewhere in the code, no?
i.e. a base URI is constructed on input, and
then subtracted out on output.
If I just write
this log:forAll :X, :Y, :TXT.
:something rdfs:label "../foo".
{ :X rdfs:label :TXT.
:Y log:uri :TXT } log:implies { ... }
in an N3 document, that shouldn't bind :Y,
should it? the ../foo label for something
could come from a different file. strings
don't carry their base URI around with them.
I guess I should write a test. But
this seems plain to me.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 00:06:52 UTC