- From: Mountain, Highland M <highland.m.mountain@intel.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 17:25:23 -0700
- To: "'Williams, Stuart'" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen'" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "'Oisin Hurley'" <ohurley@iona.com>, "'Hugo Haas'" <hugo@w3.org>, "'David Fallside'" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, "'Glen Daniels'"<gdaniels@macromedia.com>, "'Chris.Ferris@sun.com'"<Chris.Ferris@sun.com>, "'marc.hadley@sun.com'" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@akamai.com>, "'Noah Mendelsohn'"<Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "'ylafon@w3.org'" <ylafon@w3.org>, "'Mark A. Jones (E-mail)'" <jones@research.att.com>, "'www-archive@w3.org'" <www-archive@w3.org>
The most recent binding framework document contains the following: >>Goals of the Binding Framework >>To enable a SOAP node to take advantage of the native features of the underlying protocols available to it. >>[EdNote: Would be nice to have a longer list] Here's my 2 cents: To advise communicating peers how to craft transport binding specifications which facilitate system interoperability. < Any binding specification would need to take into account an underlying protocol's native feature set and potentially any messaging requirements of an application which are not satisfied by this underlying protocol. Requirements not satisfied natively by the underlying protocol of choice will also be included in the resulting binding specification. Our framework needs to address both types of features.> In a related activity, I am putting together some prose describing the framework, so I have been thinking along these lines. Comments... -----Original Message----- From: Williams, Stuart [mailto:skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 7:35 AM To: 'Henrik Frystyk Nielsen' Cc: 'Mountain, Highland M'; 'Oisin Hurley'; 'Hugo Haas'; 'David Fallside'; 'Glen Daniels'; 'Chris.Ferris@sun.com'; 'marc.hadley@sun.com'; 'Mark Nottingham'; 'Noah Mendelsohn'; 'ylafon@w3.org'; 'Mark A. Jones (E-mail)'; 'www-archive@w3.org' Subject: TBTF: In-context Framework Intro. Henrik, I've done an editing pass over the wording as we discussed on the TBTF call yesterday, HTML'ised things and added the diagram to set things in-context (I hope). I've added Doc Status and EdNotes with most of the major feedback items that I could remember (I'm working from home today and I left my scribblings at the office). I've Cc'd the other TBTF members for visibility and I've also Cc'd the public archive (only just discovered that there are both www-archive and w3c-archive) in case we want to point at this stuff later. Best regards Stuart
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 20:23:42 UTC