- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 22:29:14 -0000
- To: <www-archive@w3.org>
> [...] exploring the use of rdfs:range instead of 'values'
> as the property is the harder bit.
Just noodling on the relationship between "values" and "range"...
We have:-
:bottom :values "<length> | <percentage> | auto | inherit" .
which is *like*:-
:bottom :value v:length, v:percentage, v:auto, v:inherit .
but is more accurately modelled as:-
:bottom rdfs:range :Bottom .
:Bottom daml:unionOf
(u:length u:percentage [ daml:oneOf (v:auto v:inherit) ]) .
This means that the range of "values" in my original result is an
alternate plain text representation of the range of the CSS
properties.
{ ?x :values ?y } log:implies { ?x rdfs:range ?z . ?z rdfs:label
?y } .
or, more like:-
{ ?x :values ?y } log:implies { ?x rdfs:range ?z . ?z :altRepr ?y }
.
Which is not at all useful, unless someone really wants to follow up
and start an RDF version of CSS.
--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2001 17:30:05 UTC