- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 15:51:35 +0100 (MET)
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- cc: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, <www-archive@w3.org>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > Hugo, > if it's not so, the first set of issues should be listed as > owned by the ETF. If "editorial" means that editors may go on and > try to resolve the issues themselves, then you can probably > reassign the listed editorial issues to ETF as well as we'll > probably want to see them first. 8-) > The last issue is assigned to ETF but IMHO it shouldn't be, the > ETF hasn't got to that issue yet so I guess it should stay as is > for now. > Thank you, I modified issues 18, 159, 17, 48,55, 129, 162 to assign them to ETF, no need to thank me to give you extra work ;) -- Yves Lafon - W3C "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Friday, 9 November 2001 09:51:45 UTC