- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 15:32:13 +0200
- To: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- CC: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, www-archive@w3.org
The exact as it was before the change had some surrouding XML elements that were not defined in the Schema, and you have ommitted these. I thought it made sense, since the Schema was not defining them anyway. From memory: the sourroudning XML was something like <tag>Henry Ford</tag> Jean-jacques. Martin Gudgin wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr> > To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com> > Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@uk.sun.com>; "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" > <frystyk@microsoft.com>; <www-archive@w3.org> > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:46 PM > Subject: Re: Examples for section 5.2.2 > > > Done! (I've removed Henry For, which I guess makes sense.) > > I don't understand the bit in parentheses... > > Gudge > > > > > Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > > > Updated examples for section 5.2.2 > > > > > > Replacement text for first cyan block[1] > > > Replacement text for second cyan block[2] > > > > > > Made schema fragment well-formed schema. Added targetNamespace. Added > nsdecl > > > for tns. Simplified instance. > > > > > > Gudge > > > > > > [1] http://marting.develop.com/xmlp/issues/examples/sec5.2.2.ex1.xml > > > [2] http://marting.develop.com/xmlp/issues/examples/sec5.2.2.ex2.xml > >
Received on Friday, 1 June 2001 09:33:44 UTC