W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > December 2001

Re: WebOnt General Requirements Subgroup - Initial E-mail

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:39:14 +0100
To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: heflin@cse.lehigh.edu, dlm@ksl.stanford.edu, ned.smith@intel.com, jeremy_carroll@hp.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, connolly@w3.org, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com, herman.ter.horst@philips.com, hendler@cs.umd.edu, www-archive@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF3D01EFA9.7DF571EB-ON41256B1E.007FD330@bayer-ag.com>

> I wonder also if
> issues like being able to convey proofs for subsequent checking, and
> the associated requirement that they stay checkable (one might call
> it monotonicity of verifiability), should be thought of as a
> requirement.

my thoughts also *intersect* with that
yes, "convey for checking" and "stay checkable"
and those are testable!

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 18:40:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:39 UTC