Re: review of XML in 10 points (done)

"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
[...]
> > Grumbles aside, this is useful text...
> 
> Thanks.  I'm not sure what the next step should be.

Janet wrote:
> DanC, would you be able to take over the Comm piece until EOD Friday?

Eric Ian and I revised the text substantially,
resulting in:

  http://www.w3.org/XML/1999/XML-in-10-points
  $Date: 2001/12/07 18:27:15 $

I phoned PatH to see if there were any critical
problems remaning; he didn't see any. I don't
see Peter's phone number handy.

Peter, I did what I could to integrate the suggestions
you've made. If you find anything you can't live with,
phone me or page me today.
My inbox is too full to be a reliable way to reach me.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
office: tel:+1-913-491-0501
mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org

Received on Friday, 7 December 2001 13:49:30 UTC