RE: Issue 118 not quite closed

Are you saying that it is not clear from the text that the type is
boolean? I would tend to say that we should refer to the schema rather
than saying what type it is in the text - it seems more brittle to have
the definition in multiple places.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

>I think that something is missing here:
>
>   The type of the root attribute information item is boolean in the
>   namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.
>
>The reason for that is that "true" or "false" are canonical 
>values for a schema boolean, whereas in the current text, it 
>can be interpreted as "true" or "false" litterally, i.e. "0" 
>and "1" being not allowed.

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 15:57:36 UTC