Dan Connolly and I were talking about Web Services and Web Architecture on #rdfig today[1] and the issue of XML Protocol came up. I had previously asked the Working Group about their intentions with regards to preserving the semantics of Web Architecture and received no response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jan/0029.html Dan Connolly claims to have "asked (indirectly) for a GET (i.e. REST) related requirement for the XML Protocol requirements". I was curious if the Working Group has adopted this as a requirement, and if not, why. [1] Logs: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2001-08-15.html#T21-58-39 Thanks for your help, -- "Aaron Swartz" | Blogspace <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://blogspace.com/about/> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> | weaving the two-way webReceived on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 18:14:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:37 UTC