- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:14:31 -0400
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Dan Connolly and I were talking about Web Services and Web
Architecture on #rdfig today[1] and the issue of XML Protocol
came up. I had previously asked the Working Group about their
intentions with regards to preserving the semantics of Web
Architecture and received no response:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jan/0029.html
Dan Connolly claims to have "asked (indirectly) for a GET (i.e.
REST) related requirement for the XML Protocol requirements".
I was curious if the Working Group has adopted this as a
requirement, and if not, why.
[1] Logs:
http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfig/2001-08-15.html#T21-58-39
Thanks for your help,
--
"Aaron Swartz" | Blogspace
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://blogspace.com/about/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | weaving the two-way web
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 18:14:26 UTC