- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 14:05:08 -0500
- To: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Cc: www-annotation@w3.org
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:18:57AM +0000, Matthew Wilson wrote: > > At the moment, I seem to be able to delete annotations which have replies > (using Amaya). Is this an intended change or a bug? I thought it was always so. We had lengthly discussions about this, and, in the end, it was an arbitrary choice between A's right to retract what he said and B's right to be able to refer to something stable. Deleting an annotation or reply orphans all the replies to it. I don't mean orphaned like when the client can't resolve the context to place the annotation marker, but instead a situation where there is no association between a document and the tree of replies coming from a deleted annotation or reply. We would have to duplicate an awful lot of information in each reply if we wanted to keep it resilient against being orphaned. We could get around this by creating a DeletedAnnotation object that to replace the one that A wants to delete. This would require no immediate client changes. The server currently detects annotations or replies with replies and declines to delete them. I could just replace the body and creator information with some hard-coded haha message. What do you think? -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 03:16:24 UTC