- From: Scott Davis <scott.davis@dsto.defence.gov.au>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:03:01 +0930
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
Shriramana Sharma said the following on 12/05/05 18:42: > > Irene Vatton wrote: > >> It could work if Amaya doesn't use shortcut sequences (like Ctrl h >> Ctrl p to create a preformatted). The toolkit is not able to display >> these kind of long shortcuts in menus, so they are displayed as part >> of menu entries. > > > You are talking about the widget toolkit yes? > >> We have 3 possible solutions: >> - keep the current status waiting for a possible solution with the >> toolkit, >> - display the first part of the shortcut (Ctrl h) into the entry and >> the >> second part (Ctrl p) aligned as a classical shortcut. >> What do you think? > > > A fourth solution: > > Ctrl H P > > Much shorter and will certainly fit into the menu. Since there is no > mixing like Ctrl H Alt P, such a shortening is quite possible. > > Besides, I should think everybody is used to this kind of writing. In > case you want to make it explicit, use Ctrl + H + P or Ctrl+H+P. But the > latter is again cluttered and the former too long. Ctrl H P is just fine. Emacs menus represent it as C-h C-p, as it is a different key sequence than C-h p. > Oh, and another thing - it would be better if some consistency in > capitalization is maintained. I see some accelerators in capitals and > some in small. Capitals are the standard everywhere (especially since > they are what a use sees on the keyboard) and they should be used. I'd disagree - use lower case as that's what the user will type. Is Ctrl-H the same as Control+Shift+h ? H is the same as Shift+h. Scott
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 02:39:00 UTC