- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 03:44:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- cc: <www-amaya@w3.org>, <Jose.Kahan@inrialpes.fr>
Are you using a recent release of Amaya?
For several versions it has saved files opened without the extension in
whatever their actual location was - adding the correct suffix. But if you
don't specify a suffix for a new file Amaya does exactly what you ask and
saves that.
Being warned that you should put a file extension on a particular file is the
sort of thing you woud expect for a windows-based system (except it doesn't
warn you anymore - it adds it even if you already did) but doesn't make so
much sense on the web as a whole. It's just a convention that works well in
some setups.
cheers
Chaals
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
Hello Amaya folks,
Please forgive me if this has already been discussed
before (and point me to the discussion, please).
When I use Amaya with jigedit, Amaya saves a file with
or without a suffix (e.g., .html) depending (I believe)
on the name of the file I am editing.
I would like Amaya to warn me when I am saving a file with
or without a suffix and there is another one already there
without or with a suffix.
I don't know to what extent Amaya can add a suffix
automatically. I am not an expert on these matters. Would
it be possible for Amaya, given a media type, to query the
server for one or more possible suffixes, and when the user
has not provided a suffix on the file name:
a) If there is only one suffix expected, use it and
tell the author (when configured to tell the author).
b) If there are several possible suffixes expected, ask
the author which to use.
c) On systems where no suffix is expected (perhaps Unix
systems?) don't do any special prompting, or allow
configuration to always require a suffix.
Perhaps this is all very w3c-centric, or apache-centric.
It may be perfectly ok to publish N files with the same
name differing only by suffix (e.g., to be served using
content negotiation). However, it is a common problem
at W3C that people don't realize they are publishing
two different files, one with ".html" and one without.
It would seem that a warning from Amaya when this situation
exists would help authors a lot.
Thank you,
- Ian
--
Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 03:44:37 UTC