- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:06:21 +0200
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Aaron, We need more info. Can you post the complete protocol exchange that took place? Second question, why are you not using HTTP/1.1? :) Have you tried using mod_put in apache or my own (now old) put.c program? For every 100-continue, there's a timeout. If we don't get the reply, we then send the body. This is done as such as we don't know beforehand what's the version of the protocol and it's they way that the HTTP spec precises to do it. As for the crash, I can't reproduce it without more information from you. -jose On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:42:12PM -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote: > If Amaya attempts to PUT to a server, it will send an HTTP/1.0 request with > an "Expect: 100-continue" header. This is a 1.1 feature, and as the RFC > states: > > As the RFC you referenced states: > > An origin server [...] MUST NOT send a 100 (Continue) response if such a > request comes from an HTTP/1.0 (or earlier) client. > > It seems odd that Amaya is expecting a response that according to the RFC I Amaya is not an origin server, but an HTTP 1/1 client. > am not allowed to send it. In addition, if I do not send the 100 Continue > response (as my server does not implement it), Amaya (appropriately) sends > the body of the message. However, it then crashes (on Win32). > > I would appreciate if these two bugs (sending an inappropriate expect > header, and crashing) could be fixed. They are serious barriers to PUT > compatibility with Amaya. >
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 03:06:59 UTC