- From: John Russell <ve3ll@rac.ca>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:45:26 -0400
- To: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- CC: www-amaya@w3.org
On 28 Jun 2001, at 18:46, Dave J Woolley wrote: > > From: John Russell [SMTP:ve3ll@rac.ca] > > > > What is the procedure for entering character entities other > > than those on the accented characters list. > > For example thorn is missed as well as the representations > > for cent, pound sterling, euro, copyright etc. > [DJW:] [DJW:] > The normal OS mechanism, e.g. for Windows, > ALT-0163, or cut and paste from charmap. > For GBP, of course, you just type in, if you > are using a British keyboard. charmap does ok at direct entry of character as single byte into a file ... but what if one prefers the character entity as Ø or the &###; style of entry. ??? Amaya will be doing this next round and i am just suggesting that they have a method that includes all (latin-1) entities. currently some are missed in the standadard acentted entry way and a few more are missed in the optional method. > > > Perhaps the page that deals with accented characters can be expanded > > to include all the entities (ie generalized). Personally I would > [DJW:] > There are around 60,000 numeric entities. XML only has > four or five named character entities common to all > applications.> at present i am only concerned with the latin-1 entities. If some can be done Amaya way , then why not all > > like to see pallets for this but for the moment if the procedure > > was clearly documented (and a help menu pointer to same) > [DJW:] > If it's not clearly documented, and you are using Windows, > complain to Microsoft. > > [DJW:] Chinese on a non-Chinese build of Windows is more > difficult (Amaya doesn't support such characters yet, though); > you have to enter them into a form in IE and then cut and > paste them (works to get them into paintbrush). Actually, > Mozilla appears to hook into the the Chinese input method that > is provided for IE and allows one to compose in Chinese without > subterfuges. This is for NT; I think that Win 98 Unicode > support is less good. > > Character input methods really ought not to be the realm of > individual applications. > [DJW:] once agn -- not looking at pure entry but for the named character entity method using & and ; as bracketing > > -- > --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS. > > > John Russell, VE3LL@RAC.CA http://www.cgocable.net/~jrussel Be sure to check your HTML markup tags by using validator.w3.org
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 14:45:12 UTC