- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:18:39 -0500 (EST)
- To: Aaron Leventhal <aaronl@chorus.net>
- cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Amaya is meant to follow the guidelines, as fast as it can be implemented (along with a number of other things that are being impleemented by a small and hard-working team). In the CVS version there are shortcuts for just about everything in the linux version. I would like to do windows shortcuts too, but I don't have a windows machine currently to find out what makes sense for them. The W3C license, which is what covers Amaya, is more like a BSD license than a GPL. But I suspect building a developer community is more a question of people knowing about it and wanting to hack on a browser/editor that does lots of interesting things, and about providing the necessary support for people to work on the code. (Note that I am not part of the Amaya development team, just an intersted user, so my comments probably don't mean much ;-) cheers Charles On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Aaron Leventhal wrote: Some general questions: - Any chance of a GPL version of Amaya? A good way to attract developers. - Does anyone use Amaya as their browser? I tried some complex sites and Amaya wasn't happy. - I noticed there aren't too many keyboard shortcuts. Is Amaya meant to follow User Agent and Authoring Tool guidelines? Thanks, Aaron --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia (I've moved!)
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 17:19:41 UTC