- From: <Irene.Vatton@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 13:13:04 +0200
- To: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@dlr.de>
- cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Hi Jens, The administator of the AIX box I squat to generate a Amaya version explains me that the rule is to use X11R6 instead of X11R5. Nevertheless you are right I had to mention that in the BinDist.html file. It's done now. In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 26 Oct 1999 20:29:32 +0200." <Pine.A41.3.96.991026201527.25022A-100000@dv.go.dlr.de> > Hi, > > executing the pre-compiled binary extracted from amaya-RS6000-2.2.tar.gz > under AIX 4.1.4 I got the following errors (a similar error with version > 2.0 was caused by use of X11R6 instead of - old - X11R5 that comes with > AIX 4.1.4): > > 0509-023 Symbol XtStrin in sh is not defined. > 0509-023 Symbol XtShell in sh is not defined. > 0509-023 Symbol coreWid in sh is not defined. > 0509-023 Symbol XtCvtSt in sh is not defined. > (... many similar unresolved symbol errors deleted) > 0509-023 Symbol XwcText in sh is not define > 0509-026 System error: Cannot run a file that does not have a valid form > > If the use of X11R6 is done knowingly it should be mentioned somewhere in > the AIX binary distribution or in the announcement (I hope I haven't > overseen it). > > Thanks for Amaya > > Jens > > -- > Dr. Jens Schleusener debis Systemhaus > phone: +49 (551) 709-2493 Solutions for Research > fax: +49 (551) 709-2169 Bunsenstr.10 > mail: Jens.Schleusener@dlr.de D-37073 Goettingen > Irene.
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1999 07:13:12 UTC