- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 22:09:37 +0200
- To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Cc: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
URL: https://www.w3.org/2016/10/04-aapi-minutes.html Plain text follows: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 04 Oct 2016 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2016/10/04-aapi-irc Attendees Present Joseph_Scheuhammer, Joanmarie_Diggs, Bryan_Garaventa, Richard_Schwerdtfeger Regrets Chair Joseph_Scheuhammer Scribe joanie Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Microsoft 2. [5]ACTION-2102/ISSUE-1026: (Rich, All) Create mappings based on features in html 5.1 spec. 3. [6]ISSUE-1047: (Rich/Joseph) Handle special cases for aria-roledescription 4. [7]Github issue-428 (Cynthia/Joseph): clean up UIA mapping of aria-haspopup * [8]Summary of Action Items * [9]Summary of Resolutions __________________________________________________________ <clown> agenda: this <scribe> scribe: joanie Microsoft RS: Cynthia is not coming back to the group. ... I was told by Microsoft to send work that needs to be done to Bogdan. ... The last branch I was working on, if you could pull that in, I want to go through the whole UIA area and find out what's missing and ask Bogdan to fill it in. ... Bogdan said he would do it. JS: Is he familiar with the style? RS: Bogdan can give it to you (Joseph) or me, and we can do the actual editing. JS: I'm fine with your branch that we discussed yesterday. ... Let's see what others think. ... But then I can pull it in tomorrow. RS: There's a 2102a. ... Then I had to make some changes for James Teh. ... So those are in. JS: 2102 was pulled in. RS: I'm talking about 2102a. ... If you can, pull in branch 2102a. ... And 1047 (missed what was said) ... I think I have enough to go to James Craig and Bogdan. ... I'm also working to get James Teh as an invited expert. JS: Will Bogdan be joining us on the calls? RS: I don't believe so. ACTION-2102/ISSUE-1026: (Rich, All) Create mappings based on features in html 5.1 spec. <clown> action-2102 <trackbot> action-2102 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Create mappings based on features in html 5.1 spec. -- due 2016-08-04 -- OPEN <trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2102 [10] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2102 JS: This is the 2102a then. ... To remind people, Rich was going to add mappings for (lists a bunch of roles and properties) <clown> [11]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.h tml [11] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.html JS: I pulled it. But I gather there is a 2102a. RS: In 2102a, I put in the reverse relationships and final mappings for details and errormessage for IA2 and ATK. <clown> [12]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102/core-aam/core-aam.ht ml#ariaDetails [12] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaDetails <clown> [13]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.h tml#ariaDetails [13] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaDetails JS: (Reading from branch spec text) ... I see details-for. RS: There's an error-for. JS: Ok. Looks good to me. ... I turn it over to the rest of the group for their input. JD: I believe I've already looked at this and that I told Rich it was fine. RS: You did. (Group discusses if this is ChangeLog-entry worthy. Consensus: Yes.) JS: I heard today that details and summary were implemented in Firefox, but not released yet; in the nightly build. <clown> [14]https://twitter.com/stevefaulkner/status/783336943388127232 [14] https://twitter.com/stevefaulkner/status/783336943388127232 RS: Related aside, we finished all the DPub mappings with the exception of UIA, which I sent to Bogdan. ISSUE-1047: (Rich/Joseph) Handle special cases for aria-roledescription <clown> issue-1047 <trackbot> issue-1047 -- Mappings for empty aria-roledescription and when the element has no implicit nor explicit ARIA role -- open <trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1047 [15] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1047 JS: Special mappings for aria-roledescription when it's empty or has nothing but whitespace in it. <clown> [16]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.htm l#ariaRoleDescriptionEmptyWhiteSpaceString [16] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaRoleDescriptionEmptyWhiteSpaceString JS: Also when it has no explicit ARIA role. ... Rich and I have worked on this. See above link. ... (Reads/explains mapping proposed) JD: What exactly does not mapped mean for my platform? <clown> [17]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.htm l#document-handling_author-errors [17] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.html#document-handling_author-errors JS: It means it's not in ther at all. <clown> User Agents MUST NOT expose [18]https://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-roledescript ion when: [18] https://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-roledescription <clown> • The element it is applied to has an invalid WAI-ARIA role, or <clown> • The element does not have an implicit WAI-ARIA role JS: The above link is for the error handling section. ... I've also pasted the content above. <clown> <img aria-roledescripton="love" src="heart.png" alt="heart"> <clown> { ROLE: graphic, ROLE_DESCRIPTION: "love", NAME: "heart" JS: Should I merge these changes in? Group: Yes. Github issue-428 (Cynthia/Joseph): clean up UIA mapping of aria-haspopup JS: I'm not sure what to do about this. ... Cynthia wanted the UIA mapping for aria-haspopup cleaned up. ... I asked her what she meant by that, but she has not answered. ... Maybe it's a Bogdan issue now. RS: I noticed some other issues, so I'm going to ask Bogdan to review everything. <clown> [19]https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428 [19] https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428 JS: The URL above is for her issue. ... (Reads from issue) ... My problem was that aria-haspopup has multiple values now. RS: What I remember is that they could not implement all the tokens at this time. ... So she just wanted to go with expanded/collapsed, or whatever it is they are using. JS: Well, there is a mapping for each one. ... (Reads from spec) RS: It doesn't make sense for an expanded collapsed on a popup. <clown> [20]https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428 [20] https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428 <clown> [21]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#a riaHaspopupTrue [21] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaHaspopupTrue JD: Well, expanded and collapsed does make sense on things which have popups. ... But expanded/collapsed is not how you map the value of aria-haspopup. ... If you cannot map the different tokens, I think it needs to be a boolean. ... What was done before aria-haspopup got all the different token types? JS: Looking at the REC, it seems they mapped it to an MSAA property. RS: Let's asked Bogdan. Group: Agreed. Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions [End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:10:29 UTC