- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 22:09:37 +0200
- To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Cc: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
URL: https://www.w3.org/2016/10/04-aapi-minutes.html
Plain text follows:
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference
04 Oct 2016
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2016/10/04-aapi-irc
Attendees
Present
Joseph_Scheuhammer, Joanmarie_Diggs, Bryan_Garaventa,
Richard_Schwerdtfeger
Regrets
Chair
Joseph_Scheuhammer
Scribe
joanie
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]Microsoft
2. [5]ACTION-2102/ISSUE-1026: (Rich, All) Create mappings
based on features in html 5.1 spec.
3. [6]ISSUE-1047: (Rich/Joseph) Handle special cases for
aria-roledescription
4. [7]Github issue-428 (Cynthia/Joseph): clean up UIA
mapping of aria-haspopup
* [8]Summary of Action Items
* [9]Summary of Resolutions
__________________________________________________________
<clown> agenda: this
<scribe> scribe: joanie
Microsoft
RS: Cynthia is not coming back to the group.
... I was told by Microsoft to send work that needs to be done
to Bogdan.
... The last branch I was working on, if you could pull that
in, I want to go through the whole UIA area and find out what's
missing and ask Bogdan to fill it in.
... Bogdan said he would do it.
JS: Is he familiar with the style?
RS: Bogdan can give it to you (Joseph) or me, and we can do the
actual editing.
JS: I'm fine with your branch that we discussed yesterday.
... Let's see what others think.
... But then I can pull it in tomorrow.
RS: There's a 2102a.
... Then I had to make some changes for James Teh.
... So those are in.
JS: 2102 was pulled in.
RS: I'm talking about 2102a.
... If you can, pull in branch 2102a.
... And 1047 (missed what was said)
... I think I have enough to go to James Craig and Bogdan.
... I'm also working to get James Teh as an invited expert.
JS: Will Bogdan be joining us on the calls?
RS: I don't believe so.
ACTION-2102/ISSUE-1026: (Rich, All) Create mappings based on features
in html 5.1 spec.
<clown> action-2102
<trackbot> action-2102 -- Richard Schwerdtfeger to Create
mappings based on features in html 5.1 spec. -- due 2016-08-04
-- OPEN
<trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2102
[10] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/actions/2102
JS: This is the 2102a then.
... To remind people, Rich was going to add mappings for (lists
a bunch of roles and properties)
<clown>
[11]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.h
tml
[11] https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.html
JS: I pulled it. But I gather there is a 2102a.
RS: In 2102a, I put in the reverse relationships and final
mappings for details and errormessage for IA2 and ATK.
<clown>
[12]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102/core-aam/core-aam.ht
ml#ariaDetails
[12]
https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaDetails
<clown>
[13]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.h
tml#ariaDetails
[13]
https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action2102a/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaDetails
JS: (Reading from branch spec text)
... I see details-for.
RS: There's an error-for.
JS: Ok. Looks good to me.
... I turn it over to the rest of the group for their input.
JD: I believe I've already looked at this and that I told Rich
it was fine.
RS: You did.
(Group discusses if this is ChangeLog-entry worthy. Consensus:
Yes.)
JS: I heard today that details and summary were implemented in
Firefox, but not released yet; in the nightly build.
<clown>
[14]https://twitter.com/stevefaulkner/status/783336943388127232
[14] https://twitter.com/stevefaulkner/status/783336943388127232
RS: Related aside, we finished all the DPub mappings with the
exception of UIA, which I sent to Bogdan.
ISSUE-1047: (Rich/Joseph) Handle special cases for
aria-roledescription
<clown> issue-1047
<trackbot> issue-1047 -- Mappings for empty
aria-roledescription and when the element has no implicit nor
explicit ARIA role -- open
<trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1047
[15] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1047
JS: Special mappings for aria-roledescription when it's empty
or has nothing but whitespace in it.
<clown>
[16]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.htm
l#ariaRoleDescriptionEmptyWhiteSpaceString
[16]
https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaRoleDescriptionEmptyWhiteSpaceString
JS: Also when it has no explicit ARIA role.
... Rich and I have worked on this. See above link.
... (Reads/explains mapping proposed)
JD: What exactly does not mapped mean for my platform?
<clown>
[17]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.htm
l#document-handling_author-errors
[17]
https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/issue1047/core-aam/core-aam.html#document-handling_author-errors
JS: It means it's not in ther at all.
<clown> User Agents MUST NOT expose
[18]https://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-roledescript
ion when:
[18] https://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#aria-roledescription
<clown> • The element it is applied to has an invalid WAI-ARIA
role, or
<clown> • The element does not have an implicit WAI-ARIA role
JS: The above link is for the error handling section.
... I've also pasted the content above.
<clown> <img aria-roledescripton="love" src="heart.png"
alt="heart">
<clown> { ROLE: graphic, ROLE_DESCRIPTION: "love", NAME:
"heart"
JS: Should I merge these changes in?
Group: Yes.
Github issue-428 (Cynthia/Joseph): clean up UIA mapping of
aria-haspopup
JS: I'm not sure what to do about this.
... Cynthia wanted the UIA mapping for aria-haspopup cleaned
up.
... I asked her what she meant by that, but she has not
answered.
... Maybe it's a Bogdan issue now.
RS: I noticed some other issues, so I'm going to ask Bogdan to
review everything.
<clown> [19]https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428
[19] https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428
JS: The URL above is for her issue.
... (Reads from issue)
... My problem was that aria-haspopup has multiple values now.
RS: What I remember is that they could not implement all the
tokens at this time.
... So she just wanted to go with expanded/collapsed, or
whatever it is they are using.
JS: Well, there is a mapping for each one.
... (Reads from spec)
RS: It doesn't make sense for an expanded collapsed on a popup.
<clown> [20]https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428
[20] https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/428
<clown>
[21]https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#a
riaHaspopupTrue
[21]
https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ariaHaspopupTrue
JD: Well, expanded and collapsed does make sense on things
which have popups.
... But expanded/collapsed is not how you map the value of
aria-haspopup.
... If you cannot map the different tokens, I think it needs to
be a boolean.
... What was done before aria-haspopup got all the different
token types?
JS: Looking at the REC, it seems they mapped it to an MSAA
property.
RS: Let's asked Bogdan.
Group: Agreed.
Summary of Action Items
Summary of Resolutions
[End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2016 20:10:29 UTC