- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 16:34:22 -0400
- To: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Link: http://www.w3.org/2015/10/06-aapi-minutes.html Plain text follows: [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 06 Oct 2015 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/06-aapi-irc Attendees Present Joseph_Scheuhammer, Bryan_Garaventa, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Joanmarie_Diggs Regrets Chair Joseph_Scheuhammer Scribe joanie Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]ACTION-1717: (Joseph) Remove the MSAA plus UIA express column. 2. [5]ACTION-1309: (Cynthia) UIA mappings for aria-colindex and aria-rowindex. 3. [6]ACTION-1531: (Joseph, Alex, David) IA2 mapping of role="text". * [7]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 06 October 2015 <clown> agenda: this <scribe> scribe: joanie ACTION-1717: (Joseph) Remove the MSAA plus UIA express column. JS: My action was to remove the MSAA plus UIA express column. ... I removed the columns from the tables. ... I removed other little notes that mentioned UIA express, so it's now gone from the mapping spec. ... Cynthia was supposed to write a statement about this. ... Because she knows the status, I would prefer for her to write it rather than my doing so. ... I think the columns are still in the HTML-AAM. Do they need to be removed too? RS: What we're doing is for ARIA 1.1. ... We're in different shape. ... If they're going to do a mapping guide, I'm thinking it will be for HTML 5.1. <clown> [8]http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html [8] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html RS: If there are any problems, they won't be going back to IE because it won't be fixed there. JS: I can confirm it is for HTML 5.1. RS: Do they have a UIA column? JS: Yes. RS: I'll ping via Skype Steve Faulkner to remove the UIA express column. JS: I noticed that in many cases, the HTML mapping spec now points to the core mapping spec. <clown> action-1717? <trackbot> action-1717 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Remove the MSAA plus UIA express column -- due 2015-09-08 -- OPEN <trackbot> [9]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1717 [9] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1717 JS: And I guess you'll (Rich) need to remove this column from the SVG mapping guide. RS: Yes. I also need a UIA column. ACTION-1309: (Cynthia) UIA mappings for aria-colindex and aria-rowindex. <clown> action-1309? <trackbot> action-1309 -- Cynthia Shelly to Determine the best place to map aria-colindex and aria-rowindex for UIA. -- due 2015-08-01 -- OPEN <trackbot> [10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1309 [10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1309 JS: I asked Cynthia to update her action items. ... There are no notes for this action item. ACTION-1531: (Joseph, Alex, David) IA2 mapping of role="text". <clown> action-1531 <trackbot> action-1531 -- David Bolter to Bolter to investigate ia2 mapping of role="text" -- due 2014-11-18 -- OPEN <trackbot> [11]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1531 [11] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1531 <clown> [12]http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#ro le-map-text [12] http://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/core-aam/core-aam.html#role-map-text JS: There was some emails back and forth last week. ... It looks like James Teh wants TEXT_FRAME for IA2. ... The mapping is at the link above. ... I think we're done. ... Can we close this action? ... The full mail thread occurred in wai-xtech. <clown> [13]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0014 .html [13] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0014.html JS: The first email in the thread is at the URL above. ... (Reads portions of the thread) <clown> [14]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0020 .html [14] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0020.html RS: Why would you use the role="text" on the example in that email? <clown> [15]http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#text [15] http://w3c.github.io/aria/aria/aria.html#text JD: Ask James Craig. I believe it's one of his examples added to the spec. JS: (Reads from the spec link above) RS: I know when we had the meeting, it was about putting it on an image. ... This example seems like it was something we didn't discuss at the meeting. ... What if you put an image in the middle of that example? ... And then there's SVG. Do you put it on the individual letters, or the collection of drawings? ... I think you'd want to put it on the individual characters. JD: Why? <clown> <svg role="text" aria-label="Hi there!">… svg element describing strokes … </svg> <clown> <svg role="text" aria-label="Hi there!">… svg elements describing strokes … </svg> (Group discusses examples) RS: Looking at the heart example, the heart becomes a single piece of text. JS: And the heart becomes a single piece of text. ... But the caret navigation would be completely bogus. RS: So he's saying whatever is in there has to be treated as a single entity. ... So given multiple entities, I'd treat it as a single object rather than individual characters. (Discussion on how this might or might not be searchable) JS: About searching CSS content, the reason you cannot search it in the browser is because it's not in the DOM. [16]https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096071 [16] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096071 JS: If you have a text string, like "hello," it's made of strokes too. But that's not really important. ... That text string winds up in the accessibility APIs as "hello" ... And character navigation works. (More discussion of text, groups, strokes, and SVG) RS: The big thing we're trying to do is charts and things like that. ... Do you see why I think the text frame mapping is kind of confusing? ... You almost have to -- unless there's actual text -- treat it like a single image/object. ... Joanie, when you run across an image with alt text, what happens? JD: The alt text is displayed in braille; it's not caret navigable. <clown> [17]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0020 .html [17] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2015Sep/0020.html JS: To go back to what James said, if there is navigable text then the text interface should be supported. ... James asked if ATs should expect accessible text or not? ... But he indicated NVDA should be able to handle either case. JD: Orca can also handle it either way. ... What is lacking is user agent guidance regarding when to implement the accessible text interface or not. <clown> not for <img alt> <clown> not for role='text' with images or image-like glyphs. <clown> but for role="text' when there is nothing but text. <clown> what about svg text defined by strokes? (Discussion between JD and JS regarding where in the spec(s) determining caret navigability belongs) JS: I'm convinced it needs to be in both specs. JD: Ok. ... The user agent's implementation is what determines if it's caret navigable or not; not the author. JS: But the author needs to know if it is or not. JD: That's fair. RS: And we need to be very prescriptive, or authors will be lost. JS: But how to we clarify this? RS: We need language in both the spec and the authoring guide. <clown> "I love turtles" <clown> "An element whose entire subtree should be exposed to accessibility APIs as plain text." Summary of Action Items [End of minutes]
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 20:35:53 UTC