Do I understand right that we go with textframe role because of this
example?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
wrote:
> Thanks Jamie,
>
> On 2015-09-23 7:55 PM, James Teh wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/2015 2:44 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote:
>>
>>> If it matters, two use cases of role="text" entail that caret navigation
>>> doesn't make sense.
>>>
>> Right. However, I see that there are cases where it *might* make sense,
>> such as this example from the spec:
>> <div role="text">
>> <p>I</p>
>> <p>like</p>
>> <p>turtles</p>
>> </div>
>> In that case, the accessible *does* need IAccessibleText. And now things
>> get confusing: should the AT expect IAccessibleText or not for this role?
>> Where IAccessibleText is present, an AT certainly shouldn't just use the
>> name.
>>
>> FWIW, NVDA should handle either case with no problems as it is.
>>
>
> Cool. I think there is enough here to fill in the role mapping table with
> respect to IA2.
>
>
> --
> ;;;;joseph.
>
> 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"'
> - G. Bernhardt -
>
>