- From: david bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:58:28 -0400
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEO7jQBdmT5yTs2xVSiRC2RizNw-mrjZiKbZ7Ujrs99aTpk+ow@mail.gmail.com>
Sure, but the list wanted here is to be scoped to ARIA. To resolve this action it might be easiest for us to document all managed states (perhaps with Dominic etc) and then pick out the ARIA specific cases. Cheers, D On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Alexander Surkov < surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: > So it's not supposed to include states for things like HTML select? > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:47 AM, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> Trying to get my head back into this context. My understanding of an >> example of browser managed state related to ARIA would be something like: >> >> https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/accessible/generic/Accessible.cpp#1196 >> >> I.e. adding the FOCUSABLE state to children of an aria-activedescendant >> container. >> >> Cheers, >> David >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Alexander Surkov < >> surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-03-16 5:23 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, unmanaged is something that ARIA widget author should take care, >>>>> managed is something that the browser takes care of. Is that correct? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Close. Two things: (1) In this context, there are no "unmanaged" >>>> states, despite what the glossary entry says. (2) The issue is not >>>> limited to ARIA. >>>> >>>> The distinction has to do with who or what is controlling the states. >>>> One case is where the author manages the states, for example, setting the >>>> @selected attribute on <option> elements within a <select> using script. >>>> The other case is where those states are managed by the user agent. In >>>> either case, the relevant AAPI states are the same, regardless of what is >>>> managing them. With respect to selection, that would be >>>> MSAA/IA2:STATE_SYSTEM_SELECTED, UIA:IsSelected, ATK:STATE_SELECTED, >>>> and AXAPI:AXSelected. >>>> >>>> >>> I thought the whole point of splitting states into these two categories >>> was that the states defined by ARIA are already mapped and you need to >>> complete the a11y mapping by describing what states comes from the browser. >>> >>> >>>> How does this part conform to HTML a11y mapping guide? I assume you >>>>> don't want to list unmanaged states for, say, HTML select, no? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't understand the relevance of the HTML a11y mapping spec here. >>>> What section(s) of that spec bear on conformance with respect to this >>>> issue? The task David took on was to create a list of AAPI states that are >>>> managed by the user agent. >>> >>> >>> HTML is mostly unique thing where the browser maintained states comes >>> from. If you don't want describe things in HTML terms then you need to have >>> sort of universal neutral language. Not sure how to approach to it. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ;;;;joseph. >>>> >>>> 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"' >>>> - G. Bernhardt - >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2015 15:58:55 UTC