- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:54:53 +0100
- To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net>, "Gunderson, Jon R" <jongund@illinois.edu>, "T.V Raman" <raman@google.com>, "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org WAI-PFWG" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
As the “sinner” in public-html, I should say that role="layout" has already been mentioned in this thread - not by me though. I am not agianst 'layout'. leif h silli Cynthia Shelly, Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:30:10 +0000: > Role=layout just came up on a thread about layout tables on html. I > kind of like that. > > When I hear designers (and some authors/developers) talk about the > way a page looks, I hear "layout" much more often than than > "presentation." I hear computer scientists, spec writers, and more > experienced devs talk about content/presentation or > model/view/controller. > > Have we made a conscious choice about which of these is our audience? > > How about > <img role="decoration"> > To remove elements without children from aapi mappings. > > <table role="layout"> > To remove semantics and aapi mappings from elements with children, > without impacting the children (other than children that would be > invalid without the parent, such as <tr> and <li>) > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Schnabel, Stefan<mailto:stefan.schnabel@sap.com> > Sent: 1/30/2014 11:58 PM > To: James Craig<mailto:jcraig@apple.com>; Bryan > Garaventa<mailto:bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> > Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger<mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com>; Cynthia > Shelly<mailto:cyns@microsoft.com>; Jason > White<mailto:jason@jasonjgw.net>; Gunderson, Jon > R<mailto:jongund@illinois.edu>; T.V Raman<mailto:raman@google.com>; > w3c-wai-pf@w3.org WAI-PFWG<mailto:w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>; > wai-xtech@w3.org<mailto:wai-xtech@w3.org> > Subject: RE: PFWG-ISSUE-348: Consider renaming (now actually > 'deprecating' in ARIA 1.1) role="presentation" to avoid avoid > author confusion > >>> role="" > > Oh please. Please. Please, do NOT repeat the alt="" workaround again... > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Craig [mailto:jcraig@apple.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2014 21:52 > To: Bryan Garaventa > Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger; Cynthia Shelly; Jason White; Gunderson, > Jon R; T.V Raman; w3c-wai-pf@w3.org WAI-PFWG; wai-xtech@w3.org > Subject: Re: PFWG-ISSUE-348: Consider renaming (now actually > 'deprecating' in ARIA 1.1) role="presentation" to avoid avoid author > confusion > > On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Bryan Garaventa > <bryan.garaventa@whatsock.com> wrote: > >> So would "" be a direct mirror of the role presentation? Meaning >> that it does exactly the same thing? > > Just to clarify. This is an item for discussion. Nothing is decided... > But yes, that was my intention. role="" would be a synonym for > role="presentation" > >
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 16:55:22 UTC